Biblical Accuracy verses Creative License: What is Our Responsibility as Christian Artists?

I recently read The Shack and found myself fascinated by the controversy surrounding this amazing novel. As an artistic work, this book has been criticized for promoting a wrong-headed view of universal salvation and for being deeply subversive, scripturally incorrect, and downright dangerous.  At the same time, others have celebrated this work as creative brilliance, spiritually profound, and transformational.

I was stunned by how a single creative work could provoke such opposing responses, an observation which raised for me this question: Is an author required to maintain a sense of biblical accuracy in his or her expression of faith, and to what extent is creative license appropriate? This same question could be asked of Christian songwriters and Christian artists, many of whose works have also provoked opposing responses within the Christian community.

I consider myself a Christian artist, meaning that I use art as an expression of faith in an effort to impact things on a spiritual level. As a result, I consider myself a teacher of God’s Truth and feel a certain responsibility to ensure that my artistic expressions are accurate representations of everything I know about God and His Good News; whether my expression is written, lyrical, or visual, I feel a responsibility to convey His attributes and promises in a way that is biblically accurate and theologically sound, even at the expense of using any creative license.

After reading The Shack, I wonder about my responsibility as a Christian artist. Am I expressing my faith for the purpose of educating others about Biblical truths, or am I expressing my faith for the purpose of entertaining and encouraging others to seek God’s truth on their own? What is the purpose of my expression and does purpose really matter? At what point does creative license trump biblical accuracy?

What do you think?

2 Responses to Biblical Accuracy verses Creative License: What is Our Responsibility as Christian Artists?

  1. Rev. JIM..... says:

    IN MY VIEW AS A PASTOR, CREATIVE LICENSE NEVER TUMPS BIBLICAL ACCURACY. WHAT IS THE GOAL OF A CHRISTEN? IS IT NOT TO BE WITH CHRIST IN HEAVEN FOR ETERNATY AND DO HIS WILL, NOT OURS…. AMEN…..

  2. In my view, it is the difference between kerygmatic theology (the
    proclamation of the gospel to the world) and apologetic theology (the translation of the gospel into language and terms that will be understood within a particular culture). These two approaches to theology must be used together to present a complete gospel. The gospel, first and foremost, must be proclaimed: therefore apologetic theology that is not based on a kerygmatic foundation will be
    inadequate. Apologetic theology enables the kerygmatic message to be understood within a particular cultural setting. There is a danger in weighing either type of theology too heavily, which will result in a less effective expression of the gospel. An important balance must be maintained between the kerygmatic proclamation and the apologetic translation

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: